Friday, 31 July 2020

Koos Bekker and Paul Rawson visit Lucinda Lambourne to discuss Yarlington Lodge

KB and PR visit LL to discuss Yarlington Lodge. Account of the meeting (as provided by LL).


I had arranged a meeting with Paul Rawson on 27-July for him to come over to discuss the access that I have over the Yarlington Lodge drive. On the morning of the meeting both Koos and Paul turned up.

Topics discussed:

  • Ensuring that not all Yarlington Lodge houses were lost to the community. Informed me that they had sold Pin Lane Cottage (at a loss!) to one of the employees of the Newt. It did not go on the open market and was not offered to Lucas and Lucie Hollweg who had discussed with Sue Seager, if they were to ever sell it, to let them know. Koos said he knew nothing of this discussion or indeed who Lucas and Lucie are!!
  • Buggy track from Shatwell. Given the number of people that raised this as a concern, they have removed this from their proposal.
  • Footpath beside the ride/avenue. Again, given the number of people that raised this as a concern, they do not intend to move the existing footpath or make it into a “proper tree lined path”. We then discussed the exact positioning of the footpath as I pointed out that whilst the footpath was actually in the field, everybody actually walked up the ride. So asked them to be realistic about the impact that this would have on the use if they continued with the plan to put the new driveway up the ride and have the footpath in the field. Koos asked where else they could put the drive and I suggested through the wood – this also might mean they could bring the road out on a safer part of the hill (if they had to build it at all). Koos said he would look into that.
  • Noise from wedding/events. They do not intend to have any fireworks at the weddings/events and assured me that as the barn was on the top of the hill no noise would be heard in the village. I pointed out that the topography of the village is such that noises from the existing barn can be heard down the valley and that he should understand the impact of noise travelling around the village. I pointed out that you could hear cows and tractors in the farm yard very clearly – he asked why that was an acceptable noise?! I also pointed out that several people have informed me when the boys are playing in our garden they can hear every word given the ability for noise to travel. Koos did say that they would have a maximum capacity of 150 people (and got quite cross when I mentioned 400 people) but then discussed why they then needed parking for 150 cars to which there was no really satisfactory answer. The noise discussion was quite protracted including discussing the fact that events were being run at Yarlington House and nobody seemed to object. He likened what he was planning at Yarlington Lodge with what already happens at Yarlington House. I pointed out that he had to be joking given the frequency; size, scale and location are completely and utterly different!!
  • Access to The Old Parsonage over Yarlington Lodge Drive. They are not proposing to use the shared drive past The Old Parsonage so said he would be willing to sell it to me but suggested that they build a big wall on the other side of the drive to keep out the noise (I thought there wasn’t going to be any!) I said I would prefer not to have to endure the building work of a big wall so said they would put together a proposal. They are not intending to have any access from Crockers Hill.
  • Community. Spent a long time talking about the community and how a development of this size would change it forever and probably destroy it. The few pertinent points from this were:
    1. Koos comes from humble beginnings in South Africa and understands rural communities.
    2. He kept calling Yarlington a town and likened it several times to things that were happening in Castle Cary and North Cadbury.
    3. He thought Yarlington Lodge would provide good job prospects for the people of Yarlington - I asked him how many people in Yarlington he thought were likely to want a job at Yarlington Lodge? He appeared to have no idea of the demographic of the village.  
    4. He said that he would stop people from leaving Yarlington Lodge if that is what the village wanted – I pointed out that he can’t dictate where people will and will not walk/drive/go (and that is also not what I said!) 
    5. Likened what he was developing at the Newt to what had happened at Chatsworth in Derbyshire – turning a stately home that has been in the same family since 1549 into a commercial venture with 105 acre garden, 1,800 acre park as well as c. 5000 acres of farm land!!!

CONCLUSION: I asked that if Koos took one thing away from the meeting it was that he should to get to know the people and community of Yarlington as community is not about giving money to events/clubs but about being involved with the people who live around you and have a collective understanding and appreciation of the village in which we live.

Thursday, 30 July 2020

Response to Charlie Ellingworth from Michael Lewis

Response to CE from Michael Lewis.


From: Michael Lewis

Date: 30 July 2020 at 13:26:18 CEST

To: Charlie Ellingworth

Subject: Re:  Yarlington Lodge and The Newt


Dear Charlie,


Thank you for your email and the views expressed re. Yarlington Lodge.  Your South Somerset District Councillors for Yarlington are Councillors Henry Hobhouse and Kevin Messenger who should be the first port of call with regard to planning matters, My role as your County Councillor is slightly different, but I am able to take on board your comments if or when the application is brought to the Area East committee by the chairman, Cllr. H. Hobhouse or his chosen vice-chairman Tony Capozzoli. Besides being a County Councillor I represent a different ward ( Camelot ) as a District Councillor and so I am able to comment on applications, but members do tend to take more notice of the local ward members and as I say Cllrs. Hobhouse and Messenger in this instance.


I am very conscious of the concerns of the local residents of Yarlington regarding this application.


You may be aware that South Somerset does not have a five year land supply and the presumption by the planners is to approve applications otherwise applicants go to appeal and win approval on the basis of this lack of the land supply. Plus if the applicant feels that the councillors are being unreasonable then the Planning Inspector can award costs against the District Council.


I do know that when the Yarlington Lodge application came before Area East committee members tried to place a number of conditions on the application to try and take in to account the concerns of the local residents.


I hope this email is of assistance to you. If you need any clarification please do contact me.


With kind regards,


Mike Lewis





Wednesday, 29 July 2020

Response to Charlie Ellingworth from Robin Bastable

Response to CE from Robin Bastable.

From: Robin Bastable

Date: 29 July 2020 at 19:27:34 CEST

To: Charlie Ellingworth

Subject: Re:  Yarlington Lodge


  Dear Mr Ellingworth


 Thank you for your email and the views you express, yes I myself asked at the pre meeting what was local opinion to this and yes we were given to understand that generally they were in favour.


 I will follow up on your directions to try and ascertain local feelings on this proposal.


 I do take issue with your opinion that all the Newts plans get nodded through, the Area East Committee in my opinion is reasonable and try and do the right thing for all residents and you also have to take into account that these projects do give employment to local people, not only contractors but employees at the venues and Rural Somerset as a whole is a relatively low income area.


 Your other point about low-cost housing in the area is a valid one but that is not solely down to the Newt, the developments in Bruton started this rise in house prices in the area and recent press reports that Bruton is the new Notting Hill does not help, we could discuss this for hours but councils do no longer build affordable housing in the rural areas I’m afraid.


 If feeling is so strong in Yarlington may I suggest that you encourage as many people as possible to attend the meeting where this application is discussed with the caveat that please do not have everyone repeating the same points non stop you will loose impact, spread the points or even just say I support previous speakers, this will show local feeling and come across much better.


 If you wish to discuss any other points please do not hesitate to contact me again.


 Regards 


 Robin Bastable  


Sent from my iPad




Email from Charlie Ellingworth to all Councillor Members of the Planning Committee

 Email from CE to all Councillor Members of the Planning Committee.


Dear ________,


I am writing to you as the representative of the residents of Yarlington who are concerned about The Newt’s plans to turn Yarlington Lodge into a wedding and events venue. We had heard indirectly from a member of the Planning Committee that there was a general impression amongst the members that the Newt’s proposals had local support. 


Nothing could be further from the truth. There is almost unanimous opposition to the original proposal and a general unease at the way in which any proposals by The Newt seem to get nodded through the planning system without, seemingly, any of the scrutiny that would normally be the case - with implications for local low-cost housing. When The Newt was contained within the old Hadspen Estate, this did not impinge on local life. But with its apparently boundless plans for local expansion, this is no longer the case and we felt it was important that you were aware of this local feeling.


Please find here a link to the Yarlington Lodge website which includes a timeline of Yarlington’s interaction with The Newt this year, copies of the letters in reply to The Newt’s presentation to residents in February and the results of a survey undertaken of all the households and residents in the village and immediate surrounds.


http://yarlingtonlodge.com/


The Newt is coming back, at some point, with a revised proposal which we hope will address local concerns - and we have open minds - but we felt that it was important that you are aware of the reality of local sentiment.


Please do call me if I can add anything to this.


Kind regards


Charlie Ellingworth


Wednesday, 22 July 2020

Progress update to the Village by Charlie Ellingworth

Conference call between ML CE NH.

  • Timeline so far to be prepared for website with domain name Yarlington Lodge.

  • Contact with councillors delayed until we know extent of new proposals.

  • NH to write directly to Koos Bekker to make sure he knows both the continuing strength of local concern, and unease about the lack of transparency in the process.

Reply from Paul Rawson to Charlie Ellingworth confirming that they had no date yet for second consultation

Reply from PR to CE confirming that they had no date yet for second consultation.